home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT0853>
- <title>
- Sep. 20, 1993: Reviews:Books
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Sep. 20, 1993 Clinton's Health Plan
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- REVIEWS, Page 86
- Books
- Feminism Under Fire
-
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By MARGARET EMERY
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>TITLE: The Morning After: Sex, Fear, And Feminism On Campus</l>
- <l>AUTHOR: Katie Roiphe</l>
- <l>PUBLISHER: Little, Brown; 180 Pages; $19.95</l>
- </qt>
- <p> THE BOTTOM LINE: A young writer critiques campus feminism, with
- mixed results.
- </p>
- <p> Nothing churns up publicity like the spectacle of feuding feminists.
- Just ask Camille Paglia. With her rancorous condemnation of
- writers like Gloria Steinem and Naomi Wolf, Paglia vaulted from
- the mossy groves of academia to the glossy pages of Vanity Fair.
- Now comes Katie Roiphe, 25, to play the part of heretic in the
- feminist crusade. In The Morning After: Sex, Fear, and Feminism
- on Campus, Roiphe targets what she calls the "rape culture"
- spawned by college feminists who claim that no woman is ever
- safe from the threat of rape or sexual harassment.
- </p>
- <p> While offering provocative insights on campus feminism, The
- Morning After is crippled by clunky prose and Roiphe's self-absorbed,
- sometimes jarringly cynical tone. A Princeton graduate student,
- Roiphe relies heavily on personal anecdotes in this book, resulting
- in an uneasy mix of research and reminiscence.
- </p>
- <p> Roiphe does make several persuasive points. She charges that
- college feminists, in their zeal to raise awareness about date
- rape, have given new life to an old stereotype: the innocent
- woman who must be constantly protected from men's dangerous
- sexuality. Definitions of date rape, she contends, now include
- circumstances ("verbal coercion") that trivialize real acts
- of sexual violence. Regretted indiscretions of the night before,
- Roiphe insists, cannot become rape the morning after.
- </p>
- <p> In her most provocative chapter, Roiphe examines the Take Back
- the Night march, an annual event at many colleges in which self-identified
- rape victims march through campus and speak out about their
- rape experiences. Take Back the Night isn't a personal gesture
- of reaffirming control over one's life, Roiphe contends, but
- rather a form of public group therapy. The speak-outs have more
- in common with TV talk shows that feature recovering alcoholics
- and incest survivors than with the efforts to end violence against
- women.
- </p>
- <p> But Roiphe's shrewd observations have an ugly undercurrent.
- At one point she suggests that accounts of rape given at the
- marches may be fabricated or embellished: "The line between
- fact and fiction is a delicate one when it comes to survivor
- stories," she writes. "It's impossible to tell how many of these
- stories are authentic, faithful accounts of what actually happened.
- They all sound tinny, staged." Her insinuation is a cheap shot,
- unprovable and callous.
- </p>
- <p> When Roiphe alleges that date-rape awareness and campus safety
- lights create a climate of anxiety where none existed, she implies
- that fear of rape is irrational hysteria, churned up by frantic
- activists. But women do get raped, and being aware of one's
- vulnerability is prudent, not alarmist.
- </p>
- <p> Those who have grown weary of the stale vocabulary still embraced
- by some feminists may enjoy this book's blunt indictment of
- the we-are-all-victims mentality. But others may be put off
- by Roiphe's awkward musings and disturbing flippancy. Feminism
- thrives on many voices, but The Morning After contributes little
- to the discourse.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-